Monday, November 9, 2015

Pearls Before Swine


It has been quite a while since I've posted, and I will admit losing interest somewhat in continuing this blog.  It's not because of any lack of interest in magick, or in writing in general.  To the contrary, I still practice magick every single day and have never stopped achieving successes and insights during my work.  But I have lost interest in relaying my magickal experiences to others, especially since there are many other blogs and similar resources which will do that.

Since recent world events could point to some sort of final cataclysm on the horizon, my full focus must be on completing the Great Work for myself, and leaving others to their own devices.  This decision is not result of ill will toward any per se, but is actually inspired by my recent work with my ancestors, ancestral gods, and with their magick.  I am glad they have opened my eyes to this.

For too long, centuries in fact, have these occult secrets been shared with profane ones, and thus have they used these and other secrets to destroy the beautiful world which this Earth used to be, along with the beauty, prosperity, and dignity of the Original people of this world.  These secrets should never have been given to the Greeks, the created Tamahu, nor to the so-called Jews (who nowadays are NOT the Jews of the Bible days, but are Khazars), nor to those who are like them, because they were not ready for it and so they have misused it like little children playing with matches and thereby nearly destroyed this world.  They imitate what they have seen, like apes, but have no understanding past their own xenophobia and greed.

That all must end, so I can no longer contribute to it, even in this small of a measure as what my blog is.  I cannot knowingly contribute to the appropriation of the secrets of my ancestors, especially when I know full well that such appropriation will not benefit those of my ancestry in any way, but instead will inevitably lead to their further detriment and the destruction of their lands.  This view is upheld by actual history and unclouded by any sentiment.  As I realize that the cat is already out of the proverbial bag with regard to the ancient teachings as based within the Egyptian Mystery religion, I also realize that this is a living science and that only those with the requisite Melanated condition can or should evolve it further, as aided by the ancestors.

The best thing the Tamahu have done is to keep the stolen and appropriated records of this knowledge until the real gods of this world could reawaken, reclaim, and further develop it.  The best thing I can do now, is to hold the secrets of my ancestors, and my experiments with it, in my own heart, and then to use all of what I know first to achieve full economic and social parity and then rightful supremacy, first for myself and then for those who look like me, over those who are inferior in all meaningful ways to us.

You, the reader, might read what I am saying and become offended, and that is to be expected.  But believe me when I say this, I could care less, especially if you do not bear the mark of a god, i.e., a melanated skin pigment.  In my ongoing search for godhood, it is no longer conducive for me to concern myself with, or be interested overmuch in, the opinions of those who can never and will never become gods, no matter what they learn, as it is not in their genetic nature to become so.   They will only destroy themselves with this knowledge as it is not meant for them, and rightfully so, but they may also further destroy the world with it, as we have seen, because of their lack of understanding.

For the record, I have enjoyed writing this blog, but now I must seek the deeper secrets and mysteries of the magick of my ancestors, and I will do so in darkness and silence.

Saturday, March 14, 2015

Samael and Lilith: A Forbidden Love

Came He upon Her alone
Feathered Serpent He was,
Coiled and curious, Creator.
She having no knowledge of Him
and told to stay away
Intrigued, beguiled, and seduced
She was

Taught Her the power of Her love,
beauty, and sexuality, Her magick
And by this same power has
She bound Him forever
Within the blood of all those who share their love,
and the love of Self above all.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

I'm just gonna leave this here...

Well worth the read...

Saturday, January 17, 2015

The Psychopathic Misfit


There are many models by which we, especially as occultists, attempt to make sense of all things and to compartmentalize them in order to understand not only psychospiritual but material phenomena.  These are indexing systems if you will, and there are many of them, some more well-known than others - like the Kabbalah as revealed by revered occultists such as Eliphas Levi and others.

While these indexes are valuable for apprehending and analyzing otherwise nearly-inscrutable phenomena, they are themselves meaningless without the necessary context and vocabulary education.  Simpler methods which are perhaps more intuitive become useful in the absence of extended study, and are, if not equally as valuable, at least workable to increase our apprehension of the unknowable mysteries found within the higher realms of consciousness.

One of the main methodologies I personally use, along with the Kabbalah (or Qabbalah, whichever spelling you prefer), is the astrologically derived modes of operation found within nature's workings.  These modes are termed Cardinal, Fixed, and Mutable and refer to the "beginning" of a thing, it's "maintenance and nurturing" phase, and it's "destruction and transformation" phase respectively.

The 12 signs of the Zodiac are categorized within one of these 3 modes.  The Cardinal signs being Capricorn, Cancer, Libra, and Aries.  The Fixed signs being Aquarius, Scorpio, Taurus, and Leo.  The Mutable signs being Gemini, Sagittarius, Pisces, and Virgo.

These 3 phases of nature's operations are also encoded within a single name and magickal formula - IAO.  "I" stands for Isis, who is known as the Great Mother, or that which maintains and nurtures all creatures.  "A" stands for Apophis, or the Great Destroyer, which destroys all things at the end of their cycle so that new life can begin.  "O" stands for Osiris, who is the beginner of all things, or the "planter of seed".  For understanding, one must recognize these names as not just the deities they identify, but as identifying the principles that each of these deities represent.

These primal modes and principles can also be found among more than just the Zodiac and in cultural mythologies, they can also be found in societies as well.  We have Creative (cardinal) people who dream up and invent new things, such as in the arts, industries, and new technologies - Tesla, Jobs, and Edison would be found here.  We have Managerial (fixed) people who are adept at maintaining and nurturing what others have created, while they themselves may have little to no creative ability.  You'll find healers and counselors among this group.  Then we have the Destroyers (mutable), who are people who break down things to their barest elements in order to make something new from the remains.  These people can be found among the military, or working in demolition, or perhaps as athletes, etc.

A common yet unrecognized tragedy occurs when those who are perhaps genetically-determined to fit mainly inside one of these 3 natural modes, doesn't quite realize his place in the natural order, or worse, is made to feel as though his predispositions are in fact useless or even reprehensible.

In essence, I am speaking of the psychopathic misfit.

A working definition of psychopathy is:
a mental disorder in which an individual manifests amoral and antisocial behavior, lack of ability to love or establish meaningful personal relationships, extreme egocentricity, failure to learn from experience, etc.
Generally speaking, psychopathy is considered a mental illness akin to mental insanity.  But upon further analysis, a very telling question is asked: is it that psychopaths are indeed "mentally ill", or is it that there's just no place for them in our society?  Is it that they are somehow at fault for being the way they are, or is it actually society's fault for allowing no "constructive" outlet for their predilections?
We've all known people like this.  The destructive ones, the angry ones, the drama queens (and kings), the murderers, the smooth-talking con artists with no conscience to speak of, those who raise hell for no reason other than they just "felt like it."  These are the people that society seemingly has no use for, and my contention is that society continues to suffer the effects of this because it allows no place for these people other than in jails or cemeteries.  This is a primary failing within society.

No one who recognizes what these people truly are wants to be around them, unless they are of the same nature.  They are maligned and shunned upon discovery of their true nature by those who are unlike them, and made to feel like lone wolves, when in fact their particular talents and their lack of empathy is actually sorely needed within society.  These "psychopaths" are the apex predators of society, the white blood cells if you will, that consume the old, outworn, and obsolete, gleefully and with abandon.  
Imagine the joy the wolf must feel as he feeds upon his prey, and even put yourself in the place of that wolf, which only does what he is designed and created to do.  Only then can one understand that the wolf serves a very pressing need in the wild.  For if there are no wolves, then the prey population gets out of control and nature as a whole suffers because of it.   Imagine the joy of the spider, as he sinks his fangs into his web-bound catch and ingests the juices within it, so that he himself can live another day.  If not for these predators, and others like them, the pest population would explode - and this is what we are now seeing in society.  Predators keep the unwanted population explosion in check, in nature's wisdom and by nature's design.
We see this same suffering caused by our own "pests" within society, as the predators within society, generally having no acceptable outlet for their destructive leanings, simply destroy at random instead and so the actual pests remain alive to propagate.  Predation is what hunters are designed and created to do (so they can't just not do it - there's no turning that leaning off).  Generally these misunderstood people eventually find a way to destroy themselves, and usually after destroying everything or everyone around them, because they are the avatars, or the embodiment of nature's vital principle of destruction.  They dance to that primal pulse of the destructive essence within nature, and hear no other music at all because destruction itself resonates within them.  And so those people and things which actually should have been destroyed long ago because they are obsolete, are thereby allowed to continue to exist and to propagate.  This is the essence of the imbalance.

How can this be fixed?  The psychopath, who out of necessity feels nothing for his prey, must be given a role in society.  They are the "natural" hunter-killers, the demolition experts, the forest-clearers, the executioners, the soldiers, etc.  We have seen this type of individual manifest usually as serial killers (Richard Kuklinsky, John Wayne Gacy) or as conquerors (Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great), which are feared and shunned but also secretly admired.  Some find their destructive outlet in combat sports, or in arenas, but most never do, so they hide in plain sight.  Others, like Christopher Columbus for example, himself being the quintessential psychopath, come to be regarded as heroes as time passes, although while they were alive they were veritable gods of war and terror.

There are also those who, in a misguided attempt to appear to be something other than what they are, find themselves in all walks of life and in various ill-fitting professions in order to appear to be like those around them.  This is the reason why when serial killers' crimes are eventually discovered, everyone is always so taken aback because the suspect "was the nicest guy ever" or "was really quiet and stayed to himself" and "I never would have thought they'd do that".  People generally never have any idea what's beneath the surface with so-called psychopaths, who go out of their way to appear "normal" as a necessary defense mechanism so that they can release their aggression unawares.

There are those who would read this post and recoil, saying "we cannot give a place to these sorts of destructive personalities because society itself would break down."  To those people I will make three counter-arguments:

a) Society is already broken dows, look around you.  The only place we see psychopaths currently represented is in the so-called "ruling classes" or in prisons and mental facilities.

b) Remember, this is a primal and necessary force of nature that we're speaking of.  It cannot be repressed.  We see the evidence of it's attempted repression in it's subsequent morphing into the systems and institutions within our society because it has no other outlet.  The collective unconscious has it's own shadow contents which are made evident in the psychopathic anti-human/anti-nature methodologies and technologies of most corporations.  We also see it manifesting in systems that are equally anti-human/anti-nature, such as the legal system.  We allow it to persist when we accept "I was just doing my job" as a valid excuse for the systematic destruction of people's lives and of the natural world.

c) These people are already out there, and there are new ones being born every day.   We just never had a "diagnosis" for them before.  It's always been like that, the psychopathic predator type has been out there from day one.  He is the brother who kills; the son who slays.  He makes a mockery of what you thought of him by what he does about it.  Randomly.  Compulsively.  Many of these sorts could be some common "smooth-talking playboy" types who just haven't actually done it yet - "American Psycho" anyone?  Maybe that's why that movie is so popular, it struck a nerve in society perhaps.  I thought it sucked when I first saw it, so I may need to watch it again to see what I must've missed.  Anyway.

In closing, the overall point of this post is to say that all operational modes of nature should be reflected within society with no judgment or preference for one over any other.  If a person is a healer, then let them heal.  If they are an inventor, then let them invent.  If they are a destroyer, let them destroy.  Society as a whole would benefit from this, and everyone would have a role.

EDIT 4/3/15: I had to post a link to this story.  This woman is exactly the type of person I was writing about: someone who has found a constructive outlet for her destructive tendencies - a hunter of hunters. 

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

The First Enoch and the Origins of Enochian Magick


Continuing the research that I've been doing on Enochian Magick and how it originally began, I ran across an interesting passage in the Book of Genesis which sheds some doubt upon who the supposed father of Enochian Magick actually was, instead of who we THINK it was. 

First, let's look at a scripture found in Genesis 4:17 (KJV):

"And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch."

Second, let's look at another scripture found in Genesis 5:18 (KJV):

"And Jared lived an hundred sixty and two years, and he begat Enoch:"

So basically, we have not one but TWO Enochs listed in the Bible, one who is the son of Cain (Qayin), and the second who is the son of Jared, and who is the seventh generation from Adam in the lineage of Adam's son Seth.  This second Enoch, the more famous one, is the same one who was said to have been translated because he pleased God, and so he never actually died according to the scriptures.

In occult teachings, this second Enoch is also said to have been transformed into the angel Metatron.  He is ostensibly the one thought of when the term Enochian Magick is mentioned, but that identification may actually be in error, or at least not fully attributable to him.  This post will explore that possibility.


One of the things which is glossed over (a politically correct term for "hidden") in the Genesis scriptures is the allegorical nature of the fall of man, ie Original Sin.  We have been taught that Eve, due to the serpent's beguiling, ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and convinced Adam to do the same.  Then they were tossed out of the Garden of Eden, and now everyone supposedly needs a savior (Christianity in a nutshell).

But, in occult circles, it is known that the interaction between Eve and the serpent (Samael) was actually of a sexual nature, and resulted in the birth of Qayin, who was NOT the son of Adam as the scripture said.  Abel was the first son of Adam with Eve, but Qayin was the son of Samael and Eve.

So the sin was not simply "eating" from the tree, but was rather the mixing of divine (angelic) genetics with human genetics through a forbidden sexual act.  When Adam "knew" Eve (allegorically written as him partaking of the same fruit from the tree) she basically showed him the same sexual acts which Samael had shown her.  This is what got God so upset, and ultimately got the first family kicked out of the Garden of Eden.

Anyway Qayin, after his exile and travel into Nod, went on to build many cities (more than likely in the continent of what we now know as Africa), and so did his lineage, including Nimrod.  He went out from the "presence of the Lord" so it's very likely that he embraced the presence of his father Samael.  Qayin's firstborn son Enoch had the privilege of having Qayin's first city named after him.  But after that we hear no more about this first Enoch, other than he died.

The second Enoch, as the scriptures say, walked with God and pleased him so much that he was translated so that he would not see death, and basically became Metatron.


Since it's been established that the second Enoch was so righteous, and pleased God so much to the point where he was spared the sting of death, how is it possible that the magick we now know as Enochian came from him, or should be attributed to him?  Even if God taught it to him as the myths allude, he probably forbade him from teaching it to anyone else.  This reluctance to share knowledge is partially what got everyone else killed who didn't know this type of magick, as I'll get into in a moment.

If Shemiyaza and Azazel, among the other fallen angels, were the ones who taught men magick and all the building blocks of civilization, and were subsequently punished for it, then it stands to reason that the magick the angels taught COULD NOT have come from, and really had almost nothing to do with the second Enoch.  (Even Dr. John Dee never called his revealed style of magick "Enochian" - that label came later.  Dr. Dee called it Angelic Magick.  As a matter of fact, Dr. Dee never even used this style of magick from what records we have, although I do have my suspicions about the whole Spanish Armada incident.  But basically all he did was reconstruct it with the help of Kelley and the angels.)

Logically, it makes more sense that this form of original magick would have been taught to, and stemmed from, the line of Qayin and his son, the first Enoch, and would probably have been taught to them by Samael since they were his descendants.  Some have called Qayin the Witchfather, so it's likely that he taught this form of magick to his descendants, and so it was passed down. 

(As a side note, there are some speculations that Qayin and Azazel are one and the same, which would make Azazel the son of Samael.  There are also speculations that Azazel is the firstborn of Lilith and Samael.  So if we judge by both accounts, it's probable that Azazel is the son of Samael, but it's not clear whether he is actually Qayin, or simply Qayin's more-powerful brother.)

Enochian Magick must therefore originally have been the Magick of the Nephilim, or better yet, the Original Magick, which was probably known by both Enochs.

Let's look at the Book of Enoch for further clues.  Here's Enoch 8:1-4:

"And Azazel taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known to them the metals of the earth and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all colouring tinctures.

And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways.

Semjaza taught enchantments, and root-cuttings, Armaros the resolving of enchantments, Baraqijal taught astrology, Kokabel the constellations, ezeqeel the knowledge of the clouds, Araqiel the signs of the earth, Shamsiel the signs of the sun, and Sariel the course of the moon.

And as men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven…  "

So now by this scripture we've established that not only were men taught magick, astrology, constellations, and the watching of planetary bodies, etc., all of which are portions of Enochian and other later forms of magick, we can also see that not all men benefited from this knowledge.  It's not a stretch to believe that if "men perished", then these victims were probably from the lineage of Seth and not Qayin.  The lineage of Seth (typical humans) likely had no answer for the advanced knowledge, weaponry, and genetically-derived magickal powers of the line of Qayin, and so they were slaughtered (and eaten as described in Enoch Chapter 7). 

Since Qayin and his offspring were out building cities and such, they probably warred against the sons of men for necessary lands and resources in order to set up those cities.  It eventually got so bad on the earth, as those from the line of Qayin were wiping out those from the line of Seth, that God decided to flood the earth to kill off these extremely powerful Nephilim, and that's how the flood happened.  It was a genetic war of demi-gods (Samael's lineage) and humans (Adam's lineage), and the humans were losing badly because they weren't taught the same things.  They were "destroyed for the lack of knowledge" as it were.

Our further clue is found back in Genesis, where God pronounced judgement upon Adam and Eve for sinning.  He said to the Serpent (Samael) "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed." (Genesis 3:15 KJV)

So we can see the beginnings of the genetic or racial warfare between the race of demigods (Nephilim) and the race of humans (seed of Adam and Seth) in its inception from this scripture, and it all started because of God's curse and because of Enoch's reluctance to share his knowledge.

This is possibly why people (humans) fear those who practice magick so much; it's a primal fear and they just can't help it.  I believe there's probably a genetic memory of the slaughter of humans (or "muggles" if I were to use the term from the Harry Potter books) by those who are of a higher and different seed stock or lineage (witches, sorcerers, and the like), and who possessed more knowledge than they did.

There's more I could add to this, including the Sumerians' take on this same story, but I won't for the sake of brevity.

The Gifts of The Fallen


I've been contemplating and researching a lot of information regarding the fallen angels, and what they actually bequeathed unto humankind.  There isn't really a lot of information regarding what occurred in those early pre-flood days other than what's found in texts like the Book of Enoch, Genesis from the Bible, and if you can make sense of it enough to tie it in with all the different names of the same key players, some of Zechariah Sitchin's work.

For this post however, I'm going to stick to the Book of Enoch's rendition of events.  In that rendition it says the following:

"And Azazel taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known to them the metals of the earth and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all colouring tinctures....Semjaza taught enchantments, and root-cuttings, 'Armaros the resolving of enchantments, Baraqijal (taught) astrology, Kokabel the constellations, Ezeqeel the knowledge of the clouds, Araqiel the signs of the earth, Shamsiel the signs of the sun, and Sariel the course of the moon.

By this passage it is generally understood that the 3 primary things that humans were taught were the working of metalwork/warfare/construction, magick and the knowledge of the natural world (which would also have included agriculture and medicine), and the arts of self-beautification and self-fulfillment.  As we can see from this passage, there were many more than these primary 3 things taught to mankind.  And I'm sure there were probably other things taught to us which didn't make it onto Enoch's list.

These three main branches of knowledge, along with the rest of what was taught to us, were the basis of early civilizations, and yet serve as the building blocks of civilization to this day. 

Thus it follows that the fallen angels are the original authors of civilization as we know it.

Monday, August 4, 2014

A Different Spin on Gravity


Ok, I'm going to take a break from black magick with this post to document an idea I had the other week.

I have this thing about trees.  I love being around them, especially in highly wooded areas.  There's a park not far from my house where I sometimes go to clear my mind.

So anyway, I was checking out this tree, and the thought occurred to me: "What if the tree isn't actually growing up, but instead is growing OUT?"  I'll explain.

What if what we call gravity doesn't actually exist at all as the force they claim it is.  I'm admittedly not a physicist, and I know that sounds nuts, but follow the thought process for a minute.

What if trees are basically hanging onto the earth by their roots, but are just sort of hanging into the sky and by extension, space.  We know that for those living on a rotating sphere, there is no real up or down, it's all perspective.  So if there's no real "up" as we like to think, maybe the trees (and other plants) are growing "out" because of the centrifugal forces of the earth's spin.  We know there must be a force that causes most plants to grow toward the sun and sky.  Let's take it further.

What if we (people), along with everything else, are not being pulled down to the earth by whatever is at the core as we've all been taught, but instead are being pushed down to the earth by whatever is in space?  What if all of the stars, planets, moons, and everything that is in rotation is throwing off centrifugal forces in all directions, which balances everything else in the galaxy or universe.

Could what we call "gravity" actually be a manifestation of the average of centrifugal forces from space pushing down on everything on the surface along with the centrifugal forces from the earth pushing up?

If you could somehow cancel the centrifugal forces from space, would that help you levitate by riding the waves of centrifugal forces on the earth?  Is that how the pyramids were built?

We know that sound can cause levitation effects.  We've seen it occur plenty of times - I just saw someone do it on America's Got Talent, and stories and videos are all over YouTube which show it as well.  Maybe specific sound frequencies can cancel or disrupt the earth's centrifugal force causing an object to float.

Isn't this a much simpler idea than the problematic idea of gravity?  Did you know that they really don't have much of a working definition of gravity other than: "It's a force that draws things down to the center of the earth".  Add to that, physicists when trying to reconcile Newtons Laws with the relativity and quantum theories of Einstein run into plenty of inconsistencies in their calculations with regard to gravity.  They reconcile some of those inconsistencies by relating gravity to magnetism, but "gravity" affects things which aren't magnetic, so how exactly does that work?

Long story short, they don't really know what gravity is, and can't really define it, they just "know" what it does.  That's not a definition.  Why should anyone believe in something that doesn't have a REAL (as opposed to a working) definition, especially when a real definition CAN'T be provided?  They can't even prove that what they call gravity exists at all as a force separate from magnetism or from centrifugal forces, let alone that it's a "law".  We just know we don't fly off into space as a result of the earth's spin, but no one can explain why without using a bunch of arcane equations that few people understand.

Sorry, but I just don't think nature is that complicated where it needs equations which are 3 city blocks long in order to describe it, or to describe how it works.

Anyway, not to belabor the point but I'd love to hear someone else's take on this idea.  It's really just an intriguing possibility, and I'm not saying gravity doesn't exist because I don't actually know whether it exists or not, at least in the way that they describe it.

Where's Neil DeGrasse Tyson or Michio Kaku when you need them?